PAULA WISEMAN

Faith and life meet in a story

Home » Mark

Posts that reference the Gospel of Mark

STT: The S.P.E.C.K. Method

By

STT The S.P.E.C.K. Method title graphic featuring letters

When Jesus taught His disciples, He often addressed multiple dimensions of their lives—not just their theological understanding but their actions, emotions, and relationships. “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength” (Mark 12:30).

The S.P.E.C.K. Method helps you apply Scripture holistically by examining five key areas where God’s Word should impact your life. This approach ensures you don’t just understand the Bible intellectually but allow it to transform every aspect of who you are.

1. Sins to Avoid

Begin by identifying any sins or pitfalls mentioned:

  • What specific sinful attitudes or actions does this passage warn against?
  • Are there subtle sins of omission (things left undone) that it highlights?
  • What temptations might this passage help you recognize and resist?

For example, Ephesians 4:29-32 warns against unwholesome talk, bitterness, and unforgiveness—sins that damage relationships and grieve the Holy Spirit.

2. Promises to Claim

Look for God’s assurances:

  • What promises does God make in this passage?
  • What conditions, if any, are attached to these promises?
  • How might these promises sustain you in difficult times?

Isaiah 41:10 contains multiple promises: God’s presence (“I am with you”), strength (“I will strengthen you”), help (“I will help you”), and upholding (“I will uphold you”).

3. Examples to Follow

Identify positive models:

  • What godly characteristics or actions are demonstrated?
  • Who exemplifies faith or obedience in this passage?
  • What specific steps could you take to follow these examples?

In Philippians 2:5-11, Christ’s humility and servant heart provide a powerful example of the mindset believers should cultivate.

4. Commands to Obey

The S.P.E.C.K. method calls you to note direct commands and instructions:

  • What specific actions does God instruct you to take?
  • Are there attitudes He commands you to develop?
  • What immediate steps of obedience might this require?

The Great Commission (Matthew 28:19-20) contains clear commands to go, make disciples, baptize, and teach—directives that shape our mission as believers.

5. Knowledge to Gain

Consider what you learn about God and His ways:

  • What does this passage reveal about God’s character?
  • What theological truths does it teach?
  • How does this knowledge deepen your relationship with God?

Romans 8:28-39 reveals profound truths about God’s sovereignty, His good purposes, and the security of His love—knowledge that transforms our perspective on suffering.

For your next study session: Apply the S.P.E.C.K. method to 1 Peter 5:6-11. For each category, identify at least one insight and write down a specific application. For example, under “Commands to Obey,” you might note the instruction to “humble yourselves” and commit to a specific act of humility in your relationships this week.

How might this comprehensive approach help you apply Scripture more fully to your daily life?

STT: The Meditation Method

By

STT The Meditation Method titel graphic featuring an open Bible

When Joshua was about to lead Israel into the Promised Land, God gave him this instruction: “This Book of the Law shall not depart from your mouth, but you shall meditate on it day and night, so that you may be careful to do according to all that is written in it” (Joshua 1:8). Meditation was God’s prescribed method for internalizing Scripture.

Biblical meditation is quite different from Eastern meditation, which often involves emptying the mind. Instead, biblical meditation means filling your mind with God’s Word through thoughtful, prayerful reflection.

1. Slow Down and Savor

Meditation requires unhurried time:

  • Choose a short passage (even a single verse)
  • Read it multiple times slowly
  • Emphasize different words each time
  • Pause between readings to let the words sink in

Try reading Psalm 23:1 five times, each time emphasizing a different word: “THE Lord is my shepherd,” “The LORD is my shepherd,” and so on. Notice how the meaning shifts with each emphasis.

2. Personalize the Text

Make Scripture your own conversation with God:

  • Replace pronouns with your name
  • Rewrite passages as prayers
  • Turn statements into questions for self-examination

For example, transform Colossians 3:12 from “Put on then, as God’s chosen ones, holy and beloved, compassionate hearts…” to “Lord, help me, [your name], as your chosen and beloved child, to put on a compassionate heart today…”

3. Visualize the Scene

Use your imagination to enter the biblical narrative:

  • Picture the setting, people, and actions described
  • Imagine yourself as one of the characters
  • Consider what you might see, hear, feel, or smell

When reading about Jesus calming the storm (Mark 4:35-41), imagine the spray of water, the howling wind, the disciples’ panic, and the sudden, astonishing calm.

4. Connect to Your Life

Move from reflection to application:

  • Ask: “Where do I see this truth in my own experience?”
  • Consider: “What would change if I truly believed this?”
  • Pray: “Lord, show me how to live this out today”

For your next study session: Choose Psalm 1:1-3, which itself describes meditation on God’s Word. Spend 15 minutes with just these verses. Read them slowly, visualize the imagery of the tree planted by streams, personalize the promises, and consider what it means to be “like a tree planted by streams of water” in your daily life.

What verse might you select for extended meditation this week?

STT: The Interpretation Method

By

STT Interpretation Method title graphic with a magnifying glass, graphs and calculator to interpret data

Study Tip: The Interpretation Method

After Jesus performed miracles, His disciples often asked, “What does this mean?” (Mark 4:10). Even after careful observation, we need tools to properly understand what Scripture is teaching. Interpretation bridges the gap between what we see in the text and what it means.

1. Context Is King

The most important rule of interpretation is to honor the context:

  • Historical context (time period, culture, customs)
  • Literary context (genre, author’s style, purpose of writing)
  • Biblical context (where it fits in the overall biblical narrative)

For example, when Paul writes in 1 Corinthians 11:14 that “if a man has long hair, it is a disgrace to him,” understanding the cultural context of Corinth helps us see this was addressing a specific cultural situation rather than establishing a universal rule for all men in all times.

2. Scripture Interprets Scripture

When facing difficult passages:

  • Look for clearer passages on the same topic
  • Let explicit statements guide your understanding of figurative language
  • Remember that Scripture never contradicts itself

For instance, Jesus’ statement that “if your right eye causes you to sin, pluck it out” (Matthew 5:29) should be interpreted in light of His other teachings about the heart being the source of sin. He’s using hyperbole to emphasize the seriousness of sin, not advocating self-mutilation.

3. Identify the Main Point

Every passage has a central message:

  • Look for repeated words or themes
  • Pay attention to summary statements
  • Consider what the original audience would have understood

In the Parable of the Prodigal Son, while there are many details to observe, the main point is God’s extravagant love and forgiveness toward repentant sinners.

4. Distinguish Between Description and Prescription

Not everything described in the Bible is prescribed for us to follow:

  • Descriptions tell what happened
  • Prescriptions tell what should happen

For example, David’s multiple wives are described in Scripture, but this doesn’t mean polygamy is prescribed as God’s design for marriage.

For your next study session: Choose a passage like Romans 12:1-2. After observing what it says, interpret what it means by asking: What did this mean to the original audience? What principle is being taught? How does this connect to other Scripture? What is the main point Paul is making?

What passage might you practice interpreting using these principles?

The Scandal of the Witnesses

By

The Scandal of the Witnesses title graphic

“And in the same region there were shepherds out in the field, keeping watch over their flock by night. And an angel of the Lord appeared to them, and the glory of the Lord shone around them, and they were filled with great fear. And the angel said to them, ‘Fear not, for behold, I bring you good news of great joy that will be for all the people. For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Savior, who is Christ the Lord. And this will be a sign for you: you will find a baby wrapped in swaddling cloths and lying in a manger.’ And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God and saying, ‘Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace among those with whom he is pleased!'” – Luke 2:8-14

Last week, we explored how the incarnation itself—God becoming human—was profoundly scandalous, a stumbling block (σκανδαλίζω/skandalizō) to human expectations about divinity. Today, we turn to another scandal of the Christmas story: God’s choice of witnesses.

If you were orchestrating the most important birth in human history, who would you select as the first witnesses? Prominent religious leaders? Government officials? Respected scholars? People whose testimony would be widely believed and whose influence would spread the news effectively?

God chose shepherds.

This divine choice represents another stumbling block, another inversion of human expectations that reveals the upside-down values of God’s kingdom.

The Social Status of Shepherds

To appreciate the scandal of God’s choice, we need to understand the social position of shepherds in first-century Palestine. While we might have romanticized notions of shepherds from pastoral poetry or Sunday School illustrations, the reality was quite different:

1. They were ceremonially unclean

The nature of their work made it impossible for shepherds to observe ceremonial washing and purification rites. They couldn’t leave their flocks to participate in religious festivals. This relegated them to a perpetual state of ritual impurity.

2. They were considered untrustworthy

Shepherds had such a reputation for dishonesty that they were not permitted to testify in court. Their word was considered unreliable. The Mishnah, a collection of Jewish oral traditions, listed shepherds among those whose occupations rendered them untrustworthy.

3. They were socially marginalized

Shepherds lived on the outskirts of society, both literally and figuratively. They spent most of their time in the fields, apart from community life. Their work was considered undesirable—necessary but not respected.

4. They were economically poor

Contrary to images of shepherds as independent operators, most were hired hands working for wealthy landowners. They received minimal compensation for difficult, dangerous work.

In short, shepherds occupied one of the lowest rungs on the social ladder. They were the overlooked, the marginalized, the disregarded. Their testimony would carry little weight in respectable society.

This makes God’s choice all the more striking. The first announcement of the Messiah’s birth—the news that would change human history—was entrusted to those whose word would be questioned or dismissed by the religious and social establishment.

The Divine Reversal

This choice of witnesses wasn’t accidental or merely practical. It represented a deliberate divine reversal of human value systems. Throughout Scripture, we see God consistently working through the unlikely, the overlooked, and the marginalized:

  • He chose Abraham and Sarah, an elderly childless couple, to become the parents of a great nation
  • He selected Moses, a fugitive with a speech impediment, to confront Pharaoh
  • He anointed David, the youngest son watching sheep, to become king
  • He called Amos, a herdsman and dresser of sycamore figs, to prophesy to Israel

The selection of shepherds as the first witnesses to Christ’s birth continues this pattern. It embodies what Mary had proclaimed in her Magnificat just months earlier:

“He has brought down the mighty from their thrones and exalted those of humble estate; he has filled the hungry with good things, and the rich he has sent away empty.” (Luke 1:52-53)

This divine reversal is σκανδαλίζω—scandalous, a stumbling block—to human systems that value power, wealth, education, and social standing. It suggests that God sees value where humans often don’t, and that His kingdom operates by different principles than our social hierarchies.

The Scandal of Divine Access

Beyond challenging social hierarchies, the choice of shepherds as witnesses reveals something profound about access to God. In the religious system of the time, access to God was mediated through a complex system of purification rituals, temple worship, and priestly intercession. One’s closeness to God was thought to correlate with one’s ritual purity and religious knowledge.

The shepherds, being ceremonially unclean and religiously untrained, should have been far from divine revelation according to this understanding. Yet they received direct divine communication through angels and were granted immediate access to the newborn Messiah.

This represents another scandal—the scandal of unmediated divine access. God bypassed the religious establishment entirely, bringing His message directly to those on the margins. This foreshadowed Jesus’ later ministry, where He consistently provided direct access to God for those whom the religious system excluded:

  • Tax collectors deemed too corrupt
  • Women considered inappropriate conversation partners for rabbis
  • Samaritans viewed as religious heretics
  • Lepers judged to be under divine punishment
  • Gentiles thought to be outside God’s covenant

The shepherds’ experience anticipated a new kind of relationship with God—one based not on ritual purity or religious credentials but on divine grace and human receptivity.

The Scandal of Unlikely Messengers

There’s yet another scandal in this story: not only were the shepherds unlikely recipients of divine revelation, but they became the first evangelists of the Christian message.

Luke tells us that after seeing the baby Jesus, “they made known the saying that had been told them concerning this child. And all who heard it wondered at what the shepherds told them” (Luke 2:17-18).

These men, whose testimony wasn’t even accepted in court, became God’s chosen messengers to announce the Messiah’s birth. Those deemed unreliable by society were entrusted with history’s most important news.

This pattern would continue throughout Jesus’ ministry and the early church:

  • Samaritan woman with a questionable reputation becomes an evangelist to her town (John 4)
  • Former demoniac proclaims Jesus throughout the Decapolis (Mark 5:18-20)
  • Uneducated fishermen become apostolic leaders (Acts 4:13)
  • Former persecutor becomes the greatest missionary (Acts 9)

The scandal is that God consistently chooses unlikely messengers—people whose credibility would be questioned by conventional standards. As Paul would later write, “God chose what is foolish in the world to shame the wise; God chose what is weak in the world to shame the strong” (1 Corinthians 1:27).

The Content of the Message

The scandal extends beyond who received the message to what they were told. The angelic announcement contained elements that would have been shocking to first-century Jewish expectations:

“For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Savior, who is Christ the Lord.”

  1. “Unto you” – The personal nature of this birth—that it was specifically for these marginalized shepherds—would have been surprising in a culture that expected the Messiah to come primarily for the religiously observant.
  2. “A Savior” – While Jews expected a Messiah, the term “Savior” (sōtēr) had particular resonance in the Roman world, where it was applied to the emperor. Using this title suggested a rival claim to the emperor’s authority.
  3. “Christ the Lord” – Combining “Christ” (Messiah) with “Lord” (kyrios, a term used for God in Greek translations of the Old Testament) made a bold claim about this baby’s identity that went beyond traditional Messianic expectations.

The message itself challenged both religious and political power structures, making it as scandalous as the messengers who carried it.

The Shepherds’ Response

What’s remarkable about the shepherds is their response to this scandalous divine choice. Despite their social conditioning that would have told them they were unworthy of such revelation, they:

  1. Believed the message – They didn’t dismiss the angelic appearance as hallucination or question why they would be chosen.
  2. Acted immediately – “They went with haste” to find the baby, not delaying or second-guessing their experience.
  3. Shared what they had seen – They became witnesses, spreading the news despite their lack of social standing.
  4. Returned glorifying God – They continued their humble work, but with a new perspective, “glorifying and praising God for all they had heard and seen.”

Their response models how we might respond to God’s scandalous grace in our own lives—with simple faith, immediate action, willing testimony, and transformed perspective as we return to our daily responsibilities.

The Scandal Continues

The pattern established in the shepherds’ story—God choosing unlikely witnesses—wasn’t limited to the Christmas event but became characteristic of Jesus’ entire ministry and the early church:

  • Jesus selected fishermen, tax collectors, and political zealots as His inner circle
  • Women were the first witnesses to His resurrection, despite their testimony being devalued in that culture
  • The gospel spread first among the poor and slaves before reaching the wealthy and powerful
  • Paul boasted that “not many were wise according to worldly standards, not many were powerful, not many were of noble birth” among the early believers (1 Corinthians 1:26)

This consistent pattern suggests that God’s choice of shepherds wasn’t incidental but intentional—a revelation of how His kingdom operates.

Living with the Scandal Today

This aspect of the Christmas story challenges us in several ways:

1. It questions our criteria for credibility

Who do we consider reliable witnesses today? Whose voices do we value and whose do we dismiss? The shepherds’ story suggests we should be cautious about dismissing testimony based on social status, education, or conventional credibility markers.

2. It challenges our social hierarchies

If God deliberately chose those at the bottom of the social ladder as His first witnesses, what does that suggest about how we should structure our communities and churches? Perhaps our leadership and influence should not mirror worldly status systems.

3. It offers hope to the marginalized

For those who feel overlooked or undervalued by society, the shepherds’ story offers profound encouragement. God sees those whom society ignores and often chooses them for special purposes in His kingdom.

4. It invites us to examine our own response

Like the shepherds, we face a choice when confronted with God’s unexpected work: Will we believe despite our sense of unworthiness? Will we act immediately? Will we share what we’ve experienced? Will we return to our daily lives transformed?

The Upside-Down Kingdom

The scandal of the shepherds reveals a fundamental truth about God’s kingdom: it operates by different values than human kingdoms. As Jesus would later teach:

“The last will be first, and the first last.” (Matthew 20:16)
“Whoever would be great among you must be your servant.” (Matthew 20:26)
“Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.” (Matthew 5:3)

These aren’t just nice spiritual sayings; they represent the actual operating principles of God’s kingdom. The choice of shepherds as the first witnesses wasn’t an anomaly but a manifestation of these kingdom values.

This Christmas, perhaps we need to let ourselves be scandalized anew by God’s choice of witnesses. Perhaps we need to question our own value systems and ask whether they align with the kingdom revealed in the manger—a kingdom where shepherds receive angelic revelations, where the marginalized get front-row seats to divine action, and where those deemed unreliable by society become God’s chosen messengers.

For in this divine scandal lies an invitation—an invitation to see the world and each other through God’s eyes rather than through the distorting lens of human status systems. An invitation to value what God values and to recognize His work in unexpected places and through unexpected people.

Next week, we’ll explore our final Christmas scandal: “The Scandal of Extravagant Gifts”—examining the Magi’s lavish offerings and what they reveal about the nature of true giving in God’s kingdom.

Encounters with Jesus: The Rich Young Ruler

By

Encounters with Jesus Rich Young Ruler Title graphic

“And Jesus, looking at him, loved him, and said to him, ‘You lack one thing: go, sell all that you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me.'” – Mark 10:21 (ESV)

The question had burned within me for years:
Despite my wealth, my youth, my religious observance,
Something felt missing, incomplete, uncertain.
“Good Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?”

Not a theoretical question, not a trap,
But the deepest longing of my heart:
To know with certainty that my life mattered,
That my soul was secure, that eternity awaited.

His first words caught me off guard:
“Why do you call me good? No one is good except God alone.”
A subtle challenge to my understanding,
A question about whether I recognized who he truly was.

Then he listed the commandments I knew by heart:
“Do not murder, do not commit adultery,
Do not steal, do not bear false witness,
Do not defraud, honor your father and mother.”

I answered with genuine conviction:
“Teacher, all these I have kept from my youth.”
Not boasting, but honest assessment.
I had lived a moral, upright, observant life.

What happened next is forever etched in my memory:
Jesus looked at me—truly looked at me.
Not a glance, not a passing acknowledgment,
But a gaze that penetrated to my very soul.

“You lack one thing.”
“Go, sell all that you have and give to the poor,
And you will have treasure in heaven;
And come, follow me.”

The words fell like a hammer on my heart.
All? Everything? My lands, my investments,
My comfortable home, my fine clothes,
My security, my identity, my future?

I wanted to add Jesus to my life,
Not rebuild my life around Jesus.
I wanted eternal security as an additional asset,
Not at the cost of my earthly treasures.

So I walked away—

I often wonder what might have been
Had I said yes that day, had I sold everything,
Had I given to the poor and followed him.
What adventures might I have experienced?

Perhaps you, like me, come to Jesus earnestly,
Seeking assurance, security, eternal life,
Willing to add him to your well-ordered existence,
But hesitant to let him rearrange everything.

Perhaps you, too, have that “one thing”—
Not necessarily wealth, but something you cling to,
Something that occupies the throne of your heart,
Something you cannot imagine surrendering.

Will you, unlike me, accept the diagnosis?
Will you allow him to identify your “one thing”?
Will you receive the grace to do what seems impossible?
Will you choose treasure in heaven over treasure on earth?

For the invitation that I declined still stands:
“Come, follow me.”
And the love I saw in his eyes still shines,
Waiting for your response.

STT: Sacrifices: Connection

By

Sacrifices connection title graphic

In our previous study tips, we’ve explored how to analyze individual sacrifices, compare different types of sacrifices, and trace sacrificial themes through Scripture. Today, we’ll examine how to connect Old Testament sacrificial concepts specifically to Christ’s redemptive work, seeing how He fulfills and transforms these ancient practices.

“For it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins… we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.” – Hebrews 10:4, 10

The New Testament’s Interpretive Key

The New Testament provides the authoritative interpretation of Old Testament sacrifices, revealing that they were always pointing toward Christ. As Jesus himself said, “Everything written about me in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms must be fulfilled” (Luke 24:44).

Five Connections Between Old Testament Sacrifices and Christ

When studying Old Testament sacrifices, look for these five specific connections to Christ’s work:

1. Substitution: The One for the Many

Old Testament Pattern:

  • The offerer laid hands on the animal’s head, symbolically transferring guilt (Leviticus 1:4)
  • The animal died in place of the sinner
  • The innocent bore the punishment deserved by the guilty

Fulfillment in Christ:

  • “He himself bore our sins in his body on the tree” (1 Peter 2:24)
  • “For our sake he made him to be sin who knew no sin” (2 Corinthians 5:21)
  • “Christ died for the ungodly” (Romans 5:6)

Study Question: How does Isaiah 53:4-6 connect this substitutionary concept to the coming Messiah?

2. Blood Atonement: Life Given for Life

Old Testament Pattern:

  • “The life of the flesh is in the blood… it is the blood that makes atonement by the life” (Leviticus 17:11)
  • Blood was applied to the altar, sprinkled before the veil, or placed on the mercy seat
  • Blood represented life given to cover sin

Fulfillment in Christ:

  • “In him we have redemption through his blood” (Ephesians 1:7)
  • “The blood of Jesus his Son cleanses us from all sin” (1 John 1:7)
  • “Without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins” (Hebrews 9:22)

Study Question: How does Hebrews 9:11-14 contrast the effectiveness of animal blood with Christ’s blood?

3. Perfect Offering: Without Blemish

Old Testament Pattern:

  • Sacrificial animals had to be “without blemish” (Leviticus 1:3, 3:1, 4:3)
  • Any physical defect disqualified an animal for sacrifice
  • This requirement emphasized the need for perfection in approaching God

Fulfillment in Christ:

  • Christ was “a lamb without blemish or spot” (1 Peter 1:19)
  • He was “holy, innocent, unstained, separated from sinners” (Hebrews 7:26)
  • He “offered himself without blemish to God” (Hebrews 9:14)

Study Question: How does the requirement for unblemished sacrifices illuminate the necessity of Christ’s sinless life?

4. Comprehensive Coverage: The Complete Sacrifice

Old Testament Pattern:

  • Different sacrifices addressed different aspects of sin and relationship with God
  • The Day of Atonement provided annual comprehensive cleansing
  • Sacrifices needed constant repetition, showing their incompleteness

Fulfillment in Christ:

  • “By a single offering he has perfected for all time those who are being sanctified” (Hebrews 10:14)
  • His sacrifice was “once for all” (Hebrews 7:27, 9:12, 10:10)
  • His work addresses all aspects of our alienation from God

Study Question: According to Hebrews 10:1-14, why were repeated sacrifices necessary under the old covenant, and how does Christ’s sacrifice differ?

5. Covenant Establishment: Blood of the New Covenant

Old Testament Pattern:

  • Covenants were ratified with sacrificial blood (Genesis 15:9-18)
  • Moses sprinkled “the blood of the covenant” on the people (Exodus 24:8)
  • Blood sealed the agreement between God and His people

Fulfillment in Christ:

  • “This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many” (Mark 14:24)
  • Christ is “the mediator of a new covenant” (Hebrews 9:15)
  • His blood establishes a “better covenant” (Hebrews 8:6)

Study Question: How does Hebrews 9:15-22 explain the necessity of blood for covenant establishment?

Study Method: Typological Interpretation

To connect Old Testament sacrifices to Christ, practice typological interpretation:

  1. Identify the original meaning of the sacrifice in its Old Testament context
  2. Look for New Testament connections where this sacrifice is explicitly linked to Christ
  3. Note both similarities and differences between the type (OT sacrifice) and antitype (Christ)
  4. Recognize escalation – Christ always fulfills and exceeds the Old Testament type
  5. Avoid forced connections – focus on connections the New Testament itself makes

Example: The Day of Atonement and Christ

Let’s apply this method to the Day of Atonement (Leviticus 16):

Original Context:

  • Annual ceremony for comprehensive cleansing of priest, people, and sanctuary
  • Involved two goats: one sacrificed, one sent away bearing sins (the scapegoat)
  • Only time the high priest entered the Most Holy Place
  • Provided temporary atonement for all types of sin

New Testament Connections:

  • Hebrews 9-10 explicitly connects this ceremony to Christ’s work
  • Christ is both the sacrifice and the high priest who offers it
  • He enters not an earthly sanctuary but heaven itself
  • His blood provides eternal rather than annual redemption

Similarities and Differences:

  • Similar: Blood is required for atonement in both
  • Similar: Both address comprehensive cleansing from sin
  • Different: Christ’s sacrifice happens once, not annually
  • Different: Christ’s priesthood is permanent, not hereditary

Escalation:

  • From temporary to eternal atonement
  • From repeated to once-for-all sacrifice
  • From symbolic to actual removal of sin
  • From restricted access to God to bold approach to the throne of grace

Moving from Connection to Application

After identifying these connections, ask these application questions:

  • How does seeing Christ as the fulfillment of this sacrifice deepen my appreciation of His work?
  • What aspects of Christ’s sacrifice might I have overlooked without this Old Testament background?
  • How does this connection help me understand both the continuity and discontinuity between the covenants?
  • What response should this understanding produce in my worship and daily life?

Study Application

To apply this method in your own study:

  1. Choose one Old Testament sacrifice or ceremony
  2. Study it carefully in its original context
  3. Search for New Testament passages that connect it to Christ
  4. Identify similarities, differences, and escalation
  5. Consider how this enriches your understanding of Christ’s work

This approach transforms ancient sacrificial rituals from obscure historical practices into vibrant pictures that illuminate the person and work of Christ.

For reflection: How does understanding Christ as the fulfillment of the Old Testament sacrificial system affect your appreciation of communion/the Lord’s Supper? How might this understanding deepen your next experience of this memorial?